<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: Rock Art Brewery wins, Hansen backs off Monster Energy letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/</link>
	<description>Beernews.org: The Craft Beer News Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:25:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2009: The Year in Beer News #2 - Young &#38; Hungry - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-11040</link>
		<dc:creator>2009: The Year in Beer News #2 - Young &#38; Hungry - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7244#comment-11040</guid>
		<description>[...] Rock Art Brewery defeats a Monster &#8211; In October, a web campaign helped Rock Art Brewery defend their Vermonster Ale from Monster energy drinks (a.k.a. Hansen Beverage Company, a.k.a. Anheuser-Busch InBev). The public pressure caused the aggressors to back off. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rock Art Brewery defeats a Monster &#8211; In October, a web campaign helped Rock Art Brewery defend their Vermonster Ale from Monster energy drinks (a.k.a. Hansen Beverage Company, a.k.a. Anheuser-Busch InBev). The public pressure caused the aggressors to back off. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke Geery &#124; Extreme Journalist</title>
		<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-8218</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke Geery &#124; Extreme Journalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7244#comment-8218</guid>
		<description>[...] a little more research should be done. Of course, this isn&#8217;t going to be as easy as the Rock Art Brewery vs Monster thing, since you&#8217;re probably thinking, or great, these people are against sustainable energy! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a little more research should be done. Of course, this isn&#8217;t going to be as easy as the Rock Art Brewery vs Monster thing, since you&#8217;re probably thinking, or great, these people are against sustainable energy! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beersage</title>
		<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-8164</link>
		<dc:creator>beersage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7244#comment-8164</guid>
		<description>So the smart thing to do would be to issue the C&amp;D on Friday, negotiate through the weekend, and bow down before the social media riot ensues during the week :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the smart thing to do would be to issue the C&amp;D on Friday, negotiate through the weekend, and bow down before the social media riot ensues during the week <img src='http://beernews.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-8154</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7244#comment-8154</guid>
		<description>In regards to this quote: &quot;Hansen&#039;s contended that they were obligated to issue the C&amp;D letter or else they would lose in similar cases in the future.  Does their withdrawal mean that they didn&#039;t achieve that goal or did they just have to issue the C&amp;D letter to be ok?&quot;

From my understanding (not a lawyer, I just read up about this stuff) even with the withdrawal, they (Hansen&#039;s legal counsel) still achieved their goal.  The C&amp;D shows they defend their trademarks, and then they follow up on those C&amp;D letters (i.e. the negotiations with Rock Art) showing the C&amp;D is not a &quot;blank threat&quot;.  Now negotiating with Rock Art before the C&amp;D probably would have been better for PR, but I am not sure how negotiating first &quot;looks&quot; to a court in trying to defend a trademark.  Prior actions for trademark defense are key and the heavier and consistent the prior actions are, legally the better (or at least it seems that way to me).  Again, not a legal scholar by any means, and those are just my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to this quote: &#8220;Hansen&#8217;s contended that they were obligated to issue the C&amp;D letter or else they would lose in similar cases in the future.  Does their withdrawal mean that they didn&#8217;t achieve that goal or did they just have to issue the C&amp;D letter to be ok?&#8221;</p>
<p>From my understanding (not a lawyer, I just read up about this stuff) even with the withdrawal, they (Hansen&#8217;s legal counsel) still achieved their goal.  The C&amp;D shows they defend their trademarks, and then they follow up on those C&amp;D letters (i.e. the negotiations with Rock Art) showing the C&amp;D is not a &#8220;blank threat&#8221;.  Now negotiating with Rock Art before the C&amp;D probably would have been better for PR, but I am not sure how negotiating first &#8220;looks&#8221; to a court in trying to defend a trademark.  Prior actions for trademark defense are key and the heavier and consistent the prior actions are, legally the better (or at least it seems that way to me).  Again, not a legal scholar by any means, and those are just my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beersage</title>
		<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator>beersage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7244#comment-7939</guid>
		<description>Congrats to you, Jeff, and all the supporters.  Certainly had a hand in taming the beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to you, Jeff, and all the supporters.  Certainly had a hand in taming the beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Payette</title>
		<link>http://beernews.org/2009/10/breaking-rock-art-brewery-wins-hansen-backs-off-monster-energy-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-7932</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Payette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beernews.org/?p=7244#comment-7932</guid>
		<description>AWESOME NEWS. Glad that it is finally over and I can do other things than constantly checking the internet. Now I just realized- why the hell am I not drinking some Rock Art yet to celebrate??? Gotta get doing that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOME NEWS. Glad that it is finally over and I can do other things than constantly checking the internet. Now I just realized- why the hell am I not drinking some Rock Art yet to celebrate??? Gotta get doing that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
